Legend of the Seeker: "Rahl's kitten"




I am unwholesomely enthralled with this idea;  it's a revelation to me.

Legend of the Seeker: "Fever" "Rahl's kitten"
[Episode 21]

>:}

I am a little sick and twisty, you see.

But I can't get over the concept:   Rahl's kitten.

LOL!

-Please know that I have a cat, and I love her.  I do not find animal abuse funny in any sense-

But, for those of us with a sick sense of humor, when in the context of imagination/fantasy/suspension of reality, Darken Rahl and his kitten...even his dead kitten...are... cute.  Or something.

For Darken Rahl, that is.  As played by Craig Parker.  (Certainly not envisioning the Rahl in the book.)

For Craig Parker's own {still twisted} take on Rahl, I can even see Rahl still playing with his kitten, post mortem.  Thinking he loves it.  Carrying it around with him everywhere he goes, a bit like Linus [from Peanuts] and his blanket.  Caressing its little head affectionately.  Or something.

A little sad, a little frightening, a little uncomfortable; a little cute.   ...Like Parker's Rahl.

Thoughts on Instinctual types II


I have a friend who self-identifies as a Self-Preservation subtype.

I'm going to withhold for now what her Enneagram type is, solely for the reason that I think it might distract from the conversation.

What I find difficult to understand about my Self-Pres friend is what she wants.  In life.  She strikes me as restless.
(I think I'm restless, inside, too, but in a different way.)

Her restlessness feels to me like almost a nervous restlessness.  Not that she's nervous, and that's what makes her restless, but rather that her restlessness eats away at her, with something like an anxious urgency.  I tend to find myself feeling a little bit on the edge of restless and dissatisfied with I'm-not-sure-what when I'm with her, too.  But I'm pretty sure it's not my own.  When I leave, I feel fine, or, I get back to my own brand of  partial restlessness, part patient understanding.

Not to get off on a side conversation, but I kind of feel that the solace I have and that she seems to not have has to do with my having found my spiritual grounding; I've found the path toward what I am looking for, and, imperfect and meandering though my travel on it might be, toward home, I know, from the heart, I'm on it.  I've had my heart's questions answered...the deepest (most) of them...to my satisfaction.  It is a HUGE thing.  Anyway, my friend doesn't have that.
I wish it for her.  But that's not the point.

I'm trying to see how this relates to her Self-Pres-ness.  I'm also trying to compare what I experience with her to the other probable Self-Pres types I've known.

Ah: Here's one (I think):  I often feel like the Self-Pres types I know are looking for something, in the real world, that they can do, acquire, make, create, achieve--that will bring them something they feel they are seeking, or longing for, inside.  Perhaps a state.  Maybe they are looking for a state; I'm not sure.

But when I think of my Self-Pres type friends, I think of or see it as a lump of clay in their hands.  They know they can do something with the clay; they know the clay has near-unlimited potential uses; and whatever it is they feel they need to have, in life, they feel that they can bring it about from that clay--that thing, that substance.  The stuff of the real world that they can shape, that has form.

Even essence, or spirit.  I almost get the sense that they think that if they do just the right thing with that clay--create just right, use just right...arrange it just right, or show to others just right, or whatever...if they just do it, out of it, magically, will come even spirit or essence.

And that they spend perhaps even their whole lives, pursuing that idea.

I think that's where my friend's frustrated.  Maybe, if I've hit the nail on the head even just a little, that explains it.

I'm a Relational subtype, so I come from this bias:  An answer from an unfulfillment comes from a source.  [I'm deliberately recalling here my sense of the longing, my feeling of it, before I'd really call myself a Christian]  Somewhere, some Source has the answer, and it's like either They're hidden, or They're hiding "it"; but I know They're out there.  I just knew, had the sense, that somewhere, out there, there was...like a 'Person' (not an actual human-person), who would give me the answer, or yield to me the answer...eventually.  If I kept chasing it, dogging after it enough.  Pursuing the 'Person,' the Source.

I knew I could find it; it was like he was leaving a trail.  Little hints and clues of the answers my soul was chasing, here and there...always leading ever onward--somewhere.

But what I wonder is:  Is this sense of the 'what' you're pursuing, for your answers, in life ~ to your life questions ~ dependent on the Instinctual bias you come from?  So that I don't hurt my brain, today, I'm going to skip trying to put any thoughts or words to what Socials pursue, or see, when the shape of their longing takes form in their eyes.  It's too hard for me {Social-last}.

But I wonder if my sense of having to pursue something that I very much felt as a "person," a personality- that Source- comes because I am a Relational/Intimate type.

Maybe I'm full of it, today.

I have no clue what Self-Preservation types feel or see, in their soul's quest.  I was just speculating.  I wonder if I'm not too far off; but I really wish I could get feedback or confirmation from experienced Self-Pres types.

dammit. squee.


I do not like to publicly squee.  It is embarrassing.

I {sigh} am squeeing over LoTS: "Sanctuary," the end, fireside conversation of Richard and Kahlan.  Mostly Kahlan talking.  I swear in the last few episodes before Sanctuary and including it, Richard has, compared to Kahlan, seemed nearly asexual.

LOL  -Pardon me!  It's just that...hmm...I don't know if Bridget is acting it more...um..."wanting"...than Craig is; if that's how it's being directed or written, or just something lacking in Craig's expressions...but either way, I'm beginning to think Richard a little bit of a eunuch!  It's a wee bit disappointing.

So my 'squee!' tonight, watching "Sanctuary" was mostly thanks to the Bridget/Kahlan half of the expression of sentiment/wanting.  Maybe Richard was just feeling distracted with his nose in the Book of Counted Shadows.  He had that furrowed brow thing going on; always a good indicator that he's distracted by some aspect of his mission.  But why does he always have to be, just when Kahlan decides to let loose a tiny hint of pining/longing???

Ah... nope, I just realized that it's a writers' game:  They're doing this to us.  Because whenever it's Richard who's feeling all express-y and luuuurve-y, Kahlan is Miss Nothing-But-The-Mission.  It's supremely aggravating.

Perhaps they're doing us a favor, because should Richard and Kahlan be um...sympatico, turned-ON...at the same actual time, place, and mood/setting, several viewer spontaneous combustion fatalities might happen at the same time.  Near misses keep us only halfway there; just shy of explosion.  <:o  :D   It is probably a kindness that they are doing us, trying to build up the threshold of our squee to explosion ratio a little bit at a time.

Anyway, I have 2 episodes left to watch for Season 1, and it was just finally good to see Kahlan outright own some of her...well, wanting.  I mean, we know she does...they've written it in (just) enough, and Bridget has done an awesome job of showing the simmering of the conflict of that, below the surface, to make sure we catch it, in Kahlan...but it's just a tremendous relief...it's NICE...to see Kahlan actually let loose a little, in this episode, and admit it, outright.

DRAT Richard/Craig for being so sexless in this scene!  ARG.  Okay, I know Craig can act it (the lust stuff), so it must have been directed/written as it was.  I swear, it was like Richard was all "sympathy/concerned"-face, with his "I know what you mean..."  It was like he was playing the part of a sympathetic girlfriend sitting at the campfire...  he practically did "woman"- face!   >x{

Here, Richard...you're not using that;
*borrows boy parts*
-lend them to Kahlan, would you???  lol

~ naughty..sorry ~   :)

In awe of Bridget Regan


I'm not sure I need to write any more than the post title, but at the risk of sounding...I don't know what...:

I've watched ahead, now, online, some of the summer reruns that haven't re-run yet for my first-time-viewingness, and I'm up to "Cursed" (ep.19).

The rest of the post I'm writing to Bridget, letter-style:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dearest Bridget,

First of all, I was blown away at the hilarity of "Mirror," not just the writing, the dialogue, but how funny you and Craig can be!  I was so proud of both of you.  I could not stop laughing.  [Ah- that reminds me; Bruce, too!  I thought I'd die at his wailing, as Bianca, with Zedd's appearance/body, to her husband.  SOOO funny!]

Bridget, you can mug!  You have the best plastic face when you want to really ham it up.  I had no clue you had such a comedy bone in you....that is great!.  :)  You totally gave me the creepy crawly ickies doing the jail cell door bit, coming on to the guard...I actually felt the need to go bleach my eyes, it was so good [bad good]!

Then from that, [I watched these in one weekend] to "Cursed" {the one with the calthrop, & Kahlan's 2nd Con Dar, where she accidentally attacks the princess}-- and you just sob on command?!  I kind of hate to admit that you broke my heart, though I know it's a compliment to you.  :)  "Good job!" is an understatement.  "Quit that.  I hate you" comes closer to my true sentiment.  ~Which you've gotta read with a fake pout on my lips, but with pride {for you} in my eyes.

Similarly [back further] in "Sacrifice," when Kahlan is fighting within herself over the choice of the Mother Confessor's ultimatum to her to hand over the male Confessor baby to ultimately be drowned, or watch Richard be roasted by the confessed Zedd--I want to tell you that you did a perfect "confessor's face" [Re: the books], and it was gorgeous, the perfect transformation you did on your face...from torn/heartbroken, to pulling the pain inside, off the face {and yet we can still see it...how the hell do you do that?!? -Translate that?!}, and we watch your {Kahlan's} face cement, go stoic...just as her eyes spill over and her tears fall.  Did you plan that?  Face blank as eyes overflow?  How???  HOW???  Forgive me, I am hating you again.
Though I love you, really (for that).

I would forgive you if you kind of aided the tear thing along, by whatever means necessary...but, honestly, I'm thinking you didn't.  Because of "Cursed."  Those were real, your face and your sob was real, and it broke my heart.  You killed me.
So I totally believe you are capable of doing (unaided) what I just described in "Sacrifice."

You, love, are lethal.  (Acting chops-wise.)  As Kahlan is "ass-kicking" lethal (as well as in other ways), you are the actor's equivalent.

I'm rather riveted.

Awesome.

Rock on.

Much, much respect {and big hugs},
KtL

Note:  This reminds me, I promise a post for Craig, soon, to follow.  I have gained much respect with more eps/viewing, and want to let him know.  I am hoping maybe one or the other of you will meander by...who knows...?  And maybe get a chance to read it.  Regardless, others should know!  :)

Thoughts on Instinctual types

I've been thinking about the Instincts, in regards to my life, and the way I can't understand some types of other people.

The Instincts are pretty easily observable operating in day-to-day life, amongst friends, coworkers, family...at least, I find.

What isn't easy at all is understanding and fathoming the entire perspective shift operating throughout life from an instinctual orientation that's not my own.

Someone {one of the Enneagram author/researcher types}once said that the Instincts were perhaps a stronger and more important and fundamental difference between people than even their Enneagram type.  I think I'm starting to come around to that thinking, myself.

My biggest mystery is Socials.  It takes a big leap of the brain for me to keep my head in that perspective- well, firstly to entirely encompass the Social instinct's perspective, really- and then retain it, as I envision going about life, and various activities of the day.  It's hard work.  It feels like homework.  It takes thinking, for me, at every step.
Which is one of the first reasons why Social is not my first or even second instinct; and a good hint that it's completely dead-last.


I can understand Self-Preservation...mostly.  It's not as hard to wrap my head around; I "get" it, and it's not as hard work to envision how going through a day as a Self-Pres type might be.  I still have to stop myself and think, but it's more like the work you do trying to remember to step lightly on a sprained foot, each stride...you have to do the work of remembering, but the remembering is easier to retain and it's easier to engrain the temporary new pattern in your mind.

My Instinct is the Relational.  The Intimate [also called Sexual] instinct.  It's hard for me to imagine that other people don't go through life - in fact, the week, the day, the hours - swinging from the magnets' pull of attraction, longing; a soul-thirst sort of interest in one thing or another; fascination.  Or the desire...the desire to get under the layers of other people; to really know them.  [Even if not wanting to be so known, pursued, or probed themself...as is my case- the Five.  And perhaps the other Withdrawn triad types...well, the Nine, maybe, anyway...Okay- and some other, non-Withdrawn triad types would probably feel various aversions to that, too.]

I want to 'know' while being hidden...coccooned; until I'm ready to come out, or reveal.  But it takes a lot for a Five to feel that safe.  My therapist used to say that being around me at times was like being around a fearfully cautious baby, testing out a stranger...they need to feel you out [feel you literally, like touch your face with their hands, in a baby's case--which is what she pantomimed, while she said this], know that you're safe...that you will hold still and not frighten them while you're being explored.  If you've held very still and gentle and haven't frightened them, but have exhibited absolute trust in them, allowing yourself to be explored and known- the will settle down in your lap and be ready to place their absolute trust in you; to be intimate with you.
I think this is a very good description of a Five in love & in intimacy of any kind.  Maybe the Intimate subtype Five, in particular...maybe not.  Couldn't say.

So ~ anyway, as an Intimate Five you can see I'm at a catch-22.  Yearning for intimacy; for immediacy of knowledge, to the soul level, of the other~ in another word, a simpler word, closeness;
at the same time, fearing letting the littlest bits out, of my soul, of things dear to me, for fear that in those things not being shown love, or being valued, I will feel eradicated & destroyed, bit by bit.

Fives are very fragile, in that way.

--Not if you don't matter to them!...
but if you do..........

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Anyway, like I was saying:  I seem to be surrounded by what I see as Socials, in life, and they bug me.  Well, not that...but just...they seem to have taken over the world.  ;)

To my eyes, Sixes mimick Social-ness.  Almost all Sixes that I've known, whether their primary Instinctual subtype was Social or not, have seemed like Socials or seem to have a huge social component.  Even my best friend- who is NOT (I don't think!) a Social subtype--and she's a Six--is so much more preoccupied with the Social realm, and aware of it, involved in it, and worried [lol...see: Six--worry!] about it.  She Twitters.  >:p   Apparently.  *facepalm*

[Twitter strikes me as an overtly Social-type activity.  Much the same as Facebook, etc., etc.--all of those things.  Yes, to answer the probable unasked question: I searched my soul a lot and hesitated, 'ere I first began a blog.  (All I'm saying is, a blog, though more like a little bit of a further-apart cousin, can or cannot be, depending on what you make of it, something akin to Facebook & Twitter and the like.  They're not un-related.)]

So many popular {ugh...'popular' -itself a Social instinct idea} pastimes and things that spread and get advertised and talked about and taken up are things that Socials like.  I guess they go hand in hand; Socials like to do certain types of things, and the types of things that Socials do and habits that they have naturally lead to stuff getting 'advertised,' for lack of a better word.

Which also leads to my suspicion that Socials must make a lot of babies.  >:{

I can't see why not...what kinds of things do babies and children lead to?  Well, let's see:  Being a first-time mom (or dad) is kind of traumatic and scary, no matter how stoked you are about it--so you naturally tap in with other people who have been there, or ARE going there, before you or with you--and you can share notes and cry or freak out on other parents' shoulders.  And what is that?  That is socially connecting.

Socials (mostly) like social connection.

A little further along, what do you do with your baby(ies)?  At some point you're probably going to need sitters or daycare or early ed. of some kind...so you take them to other little groups of people you must connect with in order to get the proper care taken of your baby(ies).  -There's more.

Even later still...what's next?  School.  And activities.  And teams (of this and that), or clubs/groups.  Which requires you to meet and connect with teachers, and coaches, and scout leaders, and soccer moms, and more other parents...and more, and more....!

Good heavens, it's a frigging non-Social's nightmare!

But Socials eat it up.  It makes them feel whole, and complete, or something.  [I don't know.  ?!?!  Go ask them!]


So anyway...even if they're not, by the prospect of all this, highly motivated, even--at the very least, they feel no aversion (to making babies), for these reasons.

So you see why it's not so far beyond the pale for me to hypothesize that Socials are probably the lead baby-makers, and that their interests also tend to take over a society...by dint of the nature of their interests & likes combined with their social nature, alone?

Of course, all this goes to pot if there is no basis for believing that the Instincts are somehow hereditary.  If they are not, then all that we have are one set of Instincts' likes and interests being much better advertised and spread around by word of mouth than the other two Instincts'.  But not necessarily a population explosion of Socials, even if they do like baby-making:  If Instinctual type isn't hereditary, they'd theoretically be having as many little Relationals and Self-Pres's as they were little Socials.

*squeezes eyes* Please, God....................!

For whatever reason I've heard some others say that as far as being free (think 'unfettered') with their sexual lives goes, though, that Self-Preservation types excell.  Not that they are promiscuous; again, use the word unfettered to lead, on this one.  In the sense that Socials have certain types of fetters psychologically restraining parameters of their sexual lives and activity, and Relationals [aka Sexuals]--because one's primary Instinct is the most 'fettered' up with ' issues,'--are a conflicted group, surrounding that life area...and absolutely do not necessarily have more sex, despite what their primary Instinct's name might suggest to one's mind.  [This is all according to what I've read & heard from others.  None of this bit on the attitude and living out of their sexual lives of the Instinctual types could I verify or inform on, from my own info.  I just don't really have any.  Well, except that I can affirm as an Intimate subtype that I agree that, as one, it's not about sex, it's about intimate/deep personal connection and bonding, and the hangups of connecting or not connecting, each time & under each new circumstance, and with each new/different person.]

God bless me, I don't understand Twitter

I have friends who've nudged me toward it, a little...but I temporarily checked it out and tried it, for probably a matter of an hour or two (ha ha) on an impulse, and then nearly right away decided that I didn't think I would ever post an update to it; couldn't even see the point in ever doing so, given that you've got a maximum of a couple of sentences you can write per each post (tweet? or whatever)...and that the most I could be interested in it for is following perhaps some of the off-hand commentary of some of my favorite personalities (actors, directors, musicians, possibly politicians, etc.)...and I can do that without having a Twitter account myself or ever feeling some weird guilt or feeling that I need to jot stupid notes about what I'm doing or about me.

I can definitely see where a celebrity or person in the public eye would find it useful, though...a nice way to let people see and have a little bit of you, a little feeling of 'contact' with you, personally, without having to respond to individual fanmail and without having to do scads of interviews with reporters and such just to give the public some info and insight that they're curious about, into you.

I dunno.  I just find it silly, when trying to do it.  I could sit down and jot what I was actually doing, at whatever given moments...but I either find what I'm doing to be too lame or boring for anyone 'out there' to care about reading, or else there really is nothing exciting in my life to jot down on there...I'm such an introvert and I never go out and never do anything that others [I'm pretty sure] would find "interesting"...soooo.....

It also feels silly because as soon as I sit down to jot something I'm "doing right now" in it, it smacks me between the eyes, how narcissistic and pretentious it feels; also, that it's a lie:  As soon as I stop whatever I'm doing to go Twitter about it, I'm not really 'doing' whatever it is or was that I was heading there to type any more, am I?  Nope.  I could sit there and say "I'm blogging," but I'm not, right at that moment, am I?  No, the fact is, I'm Twittering.  I stopped whatever it was that I was doing, just to go log in to some particular website, and type out that I'm picking my nose.  Or whatever.  Which I'm no longer doing (gosh, hopefully!) because I stopped to post something on Twitter about it.

So really, to soothe the enraged fires of my integrity and impregnable sense of logic and the rational, the entries I made into Twitter would go something like this:

{shown in reverse date order from Twitter's, so you can see the progression & for the intended comedic effect}

As if anyone gives a crap and isn't laughing about why I would feel the need to post this,
Right Now, I'm: Twittering.
9:21 AM Aug 2nd from web

As if anyone gives a crap and isn't laughing about why I would feel the need to post this,
Right Now, I'm: Twittering.
6:17 PM Aug 21st from web

As if anyone gives a crap and isn't laughing about why I would feel the need to post this,
Right Now, I'm: Twittering.
2:27 PM Aug 23rd from web

Why, God, why!?!?!?????????????
I am sooooo outta here.  Lamest.  Hobby.  Ever. 
11:36 AM Aug 24th from web

Cat post #1 (you've been forewarned)

Just thought everyone should know that. Not that you care. <:) She has been up all night with me -- she does that when I stay up all night; it's so sweet the way she stays up when I'm up, sleeps when I sleep, etc. ...not always good for her, but really sweet -- and she gets so rummy the next day, I can tell she's exhausted...but she still tries to stay up, and follows me around in whatever I'm doing, generally.

She happened to be sniffing at her Booda-Bone (cloth string/rope that's really made for dogs to chew on), which I use to rub catnip into & for her to chew, claw with her back feet & hold with her front paws, & generally massacre and slobber all over- and I thought it could use a refreshing of catnip, so I rubbed some new nip in it.

Well, she went at it...but being so tired, she loses steam fast on it. When I looked just a while ago, she was splayed out on her side, eyes wide open but unfocused, tail twitching, lying next to her catnip bone. I had to talk to her and look really close to make sure her sides were moving- breathing - to know she hadn't expired!

I looked away, and checked again in a few minutes, and her eyes were closed, nose still near her catnip, little paw twitching; dreaming. SO cute. It was like she'd had a hot toddy or something; something finally to put her out in her exhausted state and make her sleep like the dead for a while.


*Now she's awake again, though, fighting to keep her eyelids open. If her eyes could be red-rimmed, they would be. LOL

Why does she do that?-Try to stay awake because I am?

If I were to go to bed right now for 8 hours (or however long), she would come join me in the bedroom, in her little bed, and sleep probably as long as I did. And get her rest.

I don't understand what motivates [different] cats; nor what cat love is. I think they all show they love you in different ways, some similar to each other, some unique. Since I can't figure out what a cat gets from staying up, even though exhausted, to be where I am, & be awake when I'm awake or to sleep when I sleep...I can only think of it being a manifestation of cat love.


**10 minutes later:

I just scooped her up and hugged her and tried carrying her into the bedroom & putting her into her cat bed (on the OFF chance she'd stay there), and told her to "go to bed" (sleep), which she knows (understands)...
...once I plopped her down, she spun around and playfully smacked me on the nose {soft paws; claws in} before jumping right out of bed and running back into the living room. <:p

When she bopped me I squealed, said "Heyyy!", chased her retreating tailside into the living room, and called her a stinker.

I love my kitty. :)

Legend of the Seeker: "Home"

I do so wish the writers would stop having Kahlan tell her most intimate secrets & feelings to Richard when he's either unconscious, not Richard (but an impostor), dead, asleep, who cares, whatever, what-have-you.

It was heartbreaking for me in "Identity;" it's old, now, as of "Home."

He's already expressed more of his feelings for Kahlan live, in person, and to her face while she was conscious, and standing there blinking at him, than she's even begun to do.

Writers, I'm tired of it.
Stop it.

Thank you. ;D

[Of course I'm aware as of this posting that the entirety of Season 1 is finished with, and either things have happened or they haven't, and there's nothing I can do about it (like I said; I'm watching for the first time, this summer)- but I have to say my peace anyway.]

Something I could do when I was little

A few years ago I had a moment, in a day, that touched upon something ~ for whatever inexplicable reason and whatever the trigger was ~ that made me remember something from childhood that I realized, incredibly, I had managed to have forgotten about, for all this time. For so many years.

How could I forget about this? The fact that I could, the fact that I did, alone, is the kind of unliklihood that raises goosebumps on the back of my neck. [As in: There's no way in a thousand years a person would just accidentally forget something like this actually happening in their life, and being real. Therefore...No accident (????) ] Yeah; like I said: goosebumpy.

All I know is that I'm thankful that the memory is not lost. Because the other creepiness factor of the quality of the "forgotten"-ness is that, once that day's trigger brought that long-ago memory back, it flooded back. With immense crispness and pages' worth of detailed clarity. A little more than uncanny; more like bizarre, you know? The way an important memory that had been taken away- temporarily stolen - from you, or had been veiled from you, in its entirety, would feel and be experienced, if it were suddenly restored to you.

Okay, okay! I'll get to it.

I remember talking to some girlfriends at the time, on the day I remembered it, and I intro'd it like this:

"Does anyone have a memory of something, from childhood, that you know happened, or that you know that you did, even though it's supposed to be impossible, and no one would believe you- either at the time, or if you told them about it now? But you KNOW that it's real, and you didn't imagine it? You know that you weren't play-acting, or fantasizing, or using your imagination...and you know that it wasn't a dream; you didn't dream it, you weren't sleeping?"

Then I told them what I remembered:

When I was little, on numerous occasions--very frequently, actually: I floated. Like, across the floor. A couple or three inches off the ground. I could do this all the time, at will. I never did it in front of anybody or if I could be observed, though; I knew not to. It was dangerous; I just knew that. Very foolish to do so. And I was not a foolish child. (Nor am I now).

It was very relaxing, and thrilling, at the same time. Thrilling in a relaxed sort of way. :) lol

I could move forward at a slow, kind of glide-y pace those few inches off the floor, whatever direction I wanted to direct my motion. I remember wanting to try to go faster; and trying to figure out how I could make that happen. I also remember trying to see if, on my feet, I could make myself float up further...you know, more than a couple of inches. But I don't remember having been able to get either of these things done. (At least, not by much.)

I remember that I had to prepare, sort of; get that particular feeling to happen, in my feet, in order to float. There was definitely a particular feeling to it; and I had to relax and focus on 'remembering it' in my feet, to bring it back to them and get that feeling to be there. After that it was no trouble keeping it going and having them stay that way, until I was done.

I remember having the feeling of being able to bring on that same feeling in my whole body, as if I could let my whole body float up, and therefore sort of 'fly.' But that trial is hazier in memory and if I did succeed at all I know it was confined to a slow floating up to my bedroom ceiling (or any ceiling), and I was frustrated by lack of directional control, in the air, and again, the speed or rate of acceleration, floating upward. It felt like there was nothing to "push off" of, in the air, once my whole body was in it. Unlike on the ground (floating on my feet, that is), where somehow the ground was the thing I could push off of, in whatever way, to achieve my will of direction that I wanted to move.

I know that I would not do it outside (the whole body floating up), because I was terrified of the fact that there was no ceiling...nothing to keep me anchored, should I not know how to stop my upward float. Inside, the ceiling kept me confined, and when I wanted to come back down, I just had to gradually relax the feeling, and as I released it I would slowly float back down, pretty much at the same rate and way I'd floated up.

Now that I think about it I think I maybe did learn how to get myself propelled forward, a bit, whole-body floating in the air; but it was slow (very slow), and I couldn't accelerate it, to make it like "flying" or anything, which is what I really wished to do. So it got boring. Relaxing (and cool), but boring.

The foot-floating was more fun. I could glide faster. And it was cool not to make any footstep noises. :D (You know, for sneakiness' sake.)


The reason I know, and knew, that this memory was not imagination or make-believe or an old dream is for a few reasons: One is that I did it with a great deal of frequency- I practiced it a LOT (trying to hone it, and stuff, like I said); another is that I distinctly remember being very awake, while doing it and practicing at it; and finally, that I was always very nervous and careful about no one being around or who could barge in, catching me doing this. As far as I remember I think it was always in a room by myself with the door(s) closed. That's how guarded it had to be.

And because I distinctly remember thinking of all the sorts of unwanted attention, interference in the peaceful state of my life as I knew it, and negative/bad/adults-freaking-out-with-nervousness it would cause if I showed anybody else I could do this. That level of guardedness and secrecy about it was always, always in the back of my mind, every time I went to do it/practice it. It was very much a logical, conscious, rational thought process- nothing like a dream. And the foremost concern for the need to hide puts down thoughts of it being an imaginary practice or make-believe. Kids don't feel the need to be that zealously guarded about something they're pretending. They especially don't go and close the doors.

There you are.

Legend of the Seeker: "Sacrifice"


Since I am watching this show for the first time through its summer reruns, this weekend was the first time I got to see Sacrifice (ep. 10).

I really want to thank whoever's idea it was for how sisters Dennee and Kahlan showed their affection and love for each other. Specifically, that they kissed each other on the lips. That was so sweet.

It's funny because in my family there is a kind of joke around that--that family kisses each other on the lips! (At least, the female members of my family do, with each other.)

I can say as a 30-something female, though I don't know if I speak for all of my generation or not, that I've felt starved for the real examples of plain ol', heterosexual, platonic, love that women have for other women who are close to their hearts; be it family, or friend, or whatever. Especially for examples showing it within popular culture.

It's wrong to leave it out.

And it's wrong (as is popularly and tediously repeated in our culture right now) to make every opportunity or instance where we're showing "girl loving girl" be something suggestive, and to have to sexualize it, or make it a "treat" for either the straight (or maybe otherwise?) male or lesbian voyeur population out there.

The fact is, we straight women need other women's love. And it's wonderful, to us. We dearly love our sisters. (Family and otherwise.)
[*Lesbians need non-romantic/platonic love from other women, too, by the way! (I wasn't trying to make a purposeful omission there, above.)]

By not showing it, in a non-sexual context, those who create entertainment out there are robbing us. I am grateful that the trend of male buddy movies and movies and TV showing brotherly devotion-love happened. The male population needed that, like a cool drink of water to parched throats.

But you skipped we women.
It's time.

So I want to thank you, so much, whoever you are, on LoTS. Whether it was the writers for this episode (I noticed both of which were men), or whether the producer(s) or director, or whether the actresses had a hand. Thank you.

Thank you from the bottom of my heart. It was so beautiful; and it almost makes me cry that I can honestly say I've never seen the purity & depth of love shown between women like that, on TV, in all my 30+ years.

Thoughts on Astrology & Birth Month



Since I find systems of study which make the world make sense for me soothing, I would like to be able to say that astrology has something to it.

But for my own purposes I've looked-- and I can't.

BUT: There is something about birth months and people that I can't throw away. As much as I've tried to find what the kernel of truth about the system of astrology might be, and have continually been frustrated by the efforts when following astrology's own rules, when I ignore the 'wisdom' of its literature and just step outside of it into my own experiences, I do find something.

But I won't name it. I don't think it has a name. [I welcome any enlightenment from anyone who knows, out there, if what I'm about to describe does have a name. Thanks!]

I've definitely noticed in my life that the people I find myself drawn toward, and experience an attraction toward, fall into a pretty small range of birth months. I'll list the signs, astrologically, that the people I'm thinking of have belonged to within these months as well, as I can't deny that I think this distinction (which narrows down a birth month into roughly 1/2 a month) has held, as well.

They are:

(Tier one)
January (Capricorn)
June (Cancer)

(Tier two)
May (Taurus)

(Tier three)
July (Leo)
October (Scorpio)
December (Sagittarius)

I know; you're saying, "Small? That's six months out of twelve."

But the reason I put them into tiers was to limit and qualify: The majority, by far, of the people that I make friends with, feel more interest in, attempt to get closer to, spend more time interacting and sharing parts of myself with, and form and retain longer-term relationships with, are the Tier 1 birth month people.
Also, the Tier 1 pattern has shown to repeat itself, over the course of my life.

There are definite differences between the January and the June people, but what they share in common as regards relationship to me, I think, is that I 'get' them; and, they stick around. The fact that they'll hold place is one part of what helps me to get to know them, to 'get' them, deeper- but the 'getting' them does go beyond just that. I just understand something fundamental, in each. And apparently they the same with me.

They're both (Junes and Januarys) patient; one set more passionate, maybe, than the other- but both patient. Both hang on, root down, or dig in, in one way or another. If they were ever 'done,' they'd let me know, I know. There'd be an integrity to it, and a finality about it.


Tier 2 I would describe as people with whom I feel a definite affinity and similarity. I find them soothing, and kindred spirits; they feel gentle and yet deep, and understanding, and underlying it all, passionate about something, I feel--even the ones who don't say it, or let it show in a big outward way. It's like a really powerful undercurrent; that's the best way to express the way I feel it.
I always get along well with these people, and enjoy being near them, whenever I am, and I feel I grow and am expanded and raised up a few levels (I don't know a better way to describe this) or something, somehow, when I engage with them & talk to them, and when we share things with each other.
But I don't tend to cling on to these people- for whatever the reason. It's not that anything bad happens, or they hurt or disappoint me or I them, in any way, or that we start to like each other less or find the other less interesting. It's just that with these people it tends to be more like fellow travelers, not going together to the same place or making the journey together, but passing each other, and having a lot in common experienced or our perceptions of the things we've experienced being highly the same. It's fun to share; we feel kindred to each other; and then we share, with twinkling eyes, and shake hands, slap backs, and continue on our way.

Okay, okay...you may have guessed - I also am in Tier 2.

But anyway- I just don't have any long-term relationships in this level. Neither would I describe the affinity to them as being an attraction in the sense of being the same as those of Tier 1. It's non-magnetic in nature. (-There we go!)


Tier 3 is really loose...I don't have many that are in there, and they're not at all "frequent." But they're not rare, either. And there's definitely a kind of a draw, or attraction.

And I would almost throw out Leo (or July), but I cannot because of 2 poignant relationships, one a Cancer but who was born in July, and the other a Leo born in July. [See what I mean about the wiggle room needed on whether it's the month or the 'sign' that's the thing? -More on this later, too.]

I find those people in Tier 3 that I've known to be sparkly (to me) and special...but they also feel hard to hold onto, and also frighten me just a bit. They either play too fast and too loose, or just a little bit too volatile (for my comfort level), or always seem about ready to fly. I find that I want to get to know them more deeply, but I am afraid of investing and being attached to ones who can't even hold onto themselves, or keep the edges or lines of themselves solid & from scattering or flying apart. Or, perhaps the fact that when they do, it often injures me, but they keep going, unscathed. And live to do it again. -Usually not very much later.

_________________________________________

So, most of my fundamental, important (in a lifelong sort of sense) relationships are with people born in January and June. Or Capricorns and Cancers.

I can't deny or get away from the truth of it, and the recurrent tenacity of the pattern.

It's something that I'll continue to pay attention to, and probably always think on. I just don't understand why this can be so, and yet the only art or study which has this as a fundamental element of it, seem to be so completely wrong and flawed and be full of bupkus.

Basically, it's made me decide to throw anything that astrology says away (and I've picked over a great deal of astrology's details), and just go from my own observations. Just start with what I see, and see if I can observe some truths from scratch.

The only thing I'm 'borrowing,' tentatively, are perhaps the beginning and end dates of astrology's birthsigns, to divvy up the months with. Because I have seen a difference between people born in the early half of a month vs. those born in the latter half. A pretty major difference.

But, I have had some super-firm disagreement with the supposed descriptors astrology gives for people born under its sunsigns. Disagreement that no 'special consideration of other astrological factors in play at the time and place of their birth' would rectify.

Sometimes a framework that's already been built by someone else can do more harm than good in discovering and verifying what's really true.



The Seven in Me

You know how you revert to that parent/child interaction pattern with your parents sometimes, no matter how many years you've lived on your own as an adult...no matter how old you are, or get to be...and no matter how evolved or 'more like friends than mother/daughter [and/or etc.]' your relationship with them seems to now be?

There will still be times when all that 'new relationship' stuff blows away, and you're back to just a snot-nosed little kid (in their eyes), and they have regressed & transformed--yet again--into a hypocritical, haughty, 'holier-than-' or 'know-better-than-'-thou, overgrown child in elders' clothing [that you can see through] in yours.

Count on it.

It's so fun. x(

So, my mother and I recently had one of these joint regressions [fighting the ironic urge here to blast "She started it!" ;) ], and we fought over it.

I'm going to skip the non-essentials to go right to the effects and personality type analysis.

_____________~Begin Enneagram lesson~______________

Background fact: I am a Five, in the Enneagram personality system.
I used to think I was a Four, but that was when I was undermedicated and much more depressed. I am a Five with a strong Four wing, and I am an Intimate subtype Five. The strong Four wing and the Intimate subtype together mean that the type of Five I am looks a lot less like the descriptions of Fives in most Enneagram books. I'm more emotional, I kind of have a huge and bleeding heart, and I experience deep longing, sometimes.

But it is the way that I deal with my inner self and my outer world, the behavior and coping and survival choices & patterns, and thinking and belief patterns, that make me "Five."

A Five's primary personality hangup follows the theme they call "Avarice." It's really packed, as a term--as most of the personality fixation words used by Enneagram experts are. But basically, in my own words, I'd describe it as the ever-present, just-beneath-the-surface & waiting-to-get-triggered feeling that whatever actual survival needs I have - that I have managed to procure and safeguard or amass, in life, are extra vulnerable to being taken, robbed of me by others.

Let me unpack survival "needs": It's different for each type of Five. Don't just straight off think stuff. Not like money, or physical possessions, food, livelihood, lover, or anything else, necessarily. It could be none, some, or all of those. Like I said, it's different for each type of Five. But Fives do have some key psychological needs that influence what kinds of things tend to trigger extra anxiety at the thought of their loss: Most or many Fives would list highly alone time and privacy, and probably the right and freedom to delve deeply into an area of their intense interest without interference, obstruction, interruption, or criticism. [A "hands off!" obsession, basically.] [-Usually, there are more like a few, or several.]

Rather than get way into the reason that some of these things are needs for Fives -you can read Enneagram books, for that- I'll just state that when something becomes a need, for an Enneagram type, that person feels (not rationalizes or thinks) that they will explode or die if they are kept from it. From having it, having control over its presence or procurement, from keeping it, or from being able to go out & somehow get it. Whatever its form, the object or thing of need has become a psychological need. Okay, not 'has become'--it just is, I should say. The theory is that this is from birth, or very shortly after.

For me, having time alone [a TON of it] is a psychological need. So are the freedom to pursue my interests without outside prevention or commentary; my cat; being free to go out and buy or have something that has stirred up feelings of longing (much like a Four) and procure it so that I can study it (even if at great physical survival cost; like, food money); and, non-judgement.

I'm not sure if non-judgement is important to me because I've been sensitized to shame and judgement for seeming "failures" while trying to make it, unaware, with A.D.D. until young-middle-adulthood; or if it's because I'm just very sensitive by nature. I think it's probably a combination of both.


Each Enneagram type has special kinds of connections to a few other numbers along the Enneagram. One of these types of connections are called "arrows" and you have two of them; an arrow to one personality type in the Enneagram that you will incidentally manifest some shades of when you are growing and expanding yourself and improving, and one arrow to another Enneagram type that you will do the same for when you are retracting, feeling the need to be self-protective, feel harmed or threatened, and feel that urge to seek the safety of the survival tactics you've used in the past that have worked- that are known. You know they might not be the best or the 'healthiest you,' but they work, you can do them, and they tend to get you what you need and get you through whatever-the-crisis, generally, every time.

For type Five, this arrow (called the Direction of Disintegration--DoD, for shorthand) points to type Seven.

When types trek along the arrow toward the E-type which lies in their Direction of Disintegration, they're not pulling into their personality wisps and shades of a healthy representation of the type that lies there; only the maladaptive- the bad habits and second- or third-rate coping and thought patterns of that type. The junk.
(Conversely, when a type follows its other arrow - toward the E-type that lies in their Direction of Integration (or DoI)- {for Five, this is Eight} - they're pulling in the healthier and most adaptive aspects of the type that lies there.)

______________~end Enneagram lesson~_____________


So, this week, my mother and I began a parent-child relationship regression cycle together (She started it!), somehow...and the subject of her triggering-a-pitfall-of-my-personality-fixation happened to be around my use of my money.

I was upset on these levels, that I'm aware of:

a) my money

b) what right has she to voice judgement on my use of my money? I am not her dependent; neither is she mine. But for our own free acts of will, free acts of choice, we do not share money. What is hers is hers, unless she volunteers to share; and what is mine is mine, likewise.

c) if I care about something, and it matters to me- whether that means care in a heart sort of way, or an interest sort of way, or a 'need' [see E-type Five references, above] sort of way, THERE IS NO SAY on my choices around it, from anyone else.

d) I am an adult.


I was just rather incredulous at her uninvited response.

I know--for some unfortunate people that I do feel sorry for, out there, this is completely normal behavior from one or both of their parents, clear into their middle-age adulthood, and for the rest of their life. I guess I have been blessed, most of the time, to have a mother who has worked to change from that "mommy/schoolmarm" role they have in our childhood, to an adult-to-adult relationship role, when it was time.

Maybe I am spoiled.

But back to the point:
I was thinking over my very strong feelings after the triggering interaction with her took place; kind of amused, surprised, and in awe of how deep and integral to a part of my sanity, even, this irate, desperate rage felt--the rage that my deep wants are sacrosanct, besides the point about it being my money and the fact that I'm an adult & yatta yatta.

It was like she spat upon my very soul. On my heart.

And I know how overblown those feelings are, given the thing we were talking about that I was going to spend money on...the thing is a pretty trivial 'thing.' It really is.

It's what it represents, I'm thinking, that was the trigger. It falls under the category of 'those things that stir up feelings and/or longing' that I wish to re-experience, evaluate, and study. Fives do that. They tend to take emotional experiences and get away alone with them, and turn them over like a smooth pebble in the palm of their hand, that they can turn and turn and stare at, run their fingers over and experience, put away and take out again as needed and at will.

I use a pebble as an example object to show really what a Five is doing in their mind. It's all being experienced in the mind. But, like me, many Fives have actual 'treasures' that are items that are of immense worth to them because they are aids and triggers for getting there. Catalyst-helpers. At times when I become especially acquisitive for certain things it is usually over a 'catalyst' item. It's triggering me; I 'know' that it will help me find out, understand, the feeling/longing that is talking to me, and I want to hear its voice plainly. But the catalyst thing I'm seeking doesn't just help me hear the question or experience the asking for the feeling I'm longing for; it simultaneously answers it, gives it, assuages it. It's finding out the thirst and getting the drink for it -a little bit, anyway- at the same time.

It helps.

It helps me internally answer the question as to what's missing, what my mind & heart & psyche are wanting, by getting ever closer through fulfilling it a little at a time, by whatever does soothe it a little.

To the person who trespassed & judged me, this week, it is just another unnecessary expenditure of momentary and meager value, in what seems to be an intermittent pattern of them, over time, and currently happening when financial times are tight.

But life never bores of demonstrating to us in endlessly instructive, intricate, and creative ways why we should not bother to judge other people. It really is fools' labor.

What I remembered after analyzing why my feelings were so intense and immediate as they were was something I learned studying the Enneagram, regarding type Seven [Five's point of Direction of Disintegration]:

Sevens fear being trapped without the safety of their diversion of pleasure. Being trapped in deprivation. Being trapped in pain. And they can get awfully angry if it's you standing in the way of them, with pain hot on their heels, running to catch them from behind. They're frightened, but they just appear livid, with a kind of large-presence, assertive, intimidation anger staring you down. And very entitled. In this sort of mode they can take on a demeaning air, and can try to paint you as pretty petty, at the least; and not infrequently, as near borderline fascist.

And I thought, as I'm thinking now, "Yeah, when I'm angry and feel violated over my pursuit of a need, that's pretty much me."

Righteous indignation has nothing on me at that point. They are dismissed. [Also very Seven-like.] I may begin to argue them at first, but as my anger heats up over their absence of a right to speak on my life--and over the fact that I'm even arguing it with them, as if they had validation--I quickly just reject them, period. Done.

If they come back recanting or apologizing, fine. Bygones.

If they don't, things are left as they are- I was done; it stays being 'Done.'

I can't, and won't, and don't, live with a judging 'friend' or person or family member.

[*Ones that choose to show/express it to me. We all judge; I judge, too. But the smart ones of us who value and like to keep our relations, don't. There is a way of non-intrusively and non-offensively expressing to someone you care about that you have a concern for them, though it takes practice and it's hard--but yet that's still an entirely different thing, and coming out of an entirely different motivation & from an entirely different place--than the person feeling angry judgement-type feelings and thinking they have the right to victimize you with them. Usually the recipient can well tell the difference. Though, not all. And that's an entirely separate problem (people who can't tell the difference and people who feel judged by what isn't judgement, or feel judged at anything, regardless).]

Anyway, in this way, I notice a lot of Seven in me. It makes me irate to be denied pleasure that's needed. Or for someone to try to control, or think they have the right to stop me, anyway, from the pursuit of a needed salve; needed pleasure. Them speaking on it at all is the same as stealing water from my lips when I'm dehydrated in the desert.